10 research outputs found

    Learning Clinical Data Representations for Machine Learning

    Get PDF

    Comparison of family health history in surveys vs electronic health record data mapped to the observational medical outcomes partnership data model in the All of Us Research Program

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: Family health history is important to clinical care and precision medicine. Prior studies show gaps in data collected from patient surveys and electronic health records (EHRs). The All of Us Research Program collects family history from participants via surveys and EHRs. This Demonstration Project aims to evaluate availability of family health history information within the publicly available data from All of Us and to characterize the data from both sources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surveys were completed by participants on an electronic portal. EHR data was mapped to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership data model. We used descriptive statistics to perform exploratory analysis of the data, including evaluating a list of medically actionable genetic disorders. We performed a subanalysis on participants who had both survey and EHR data. RESULTS: There were 54 872 participants with family history data. Of those, 26% had EHR data only, 63% had survey only, and 10.5% had data from both sources. There were 35 217 participants with reported family history of a medically actionable genetic disorder (9% from EHR only, 89% from surveys, and 2% from both). In the subanalysis, we found inconsistencies between the surveys and EHRs. More details came from surveys. When both mentioned a similar disease, the source of truth was unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Compiling data from both surveys and EHR can provide a more comprehensive source for family health history, but informatics challenges and opportunities exist. Access to more complete understanding of a person\u27s family health history may provide opportunities for precision medicine

    Effect of different extraction techniques on yield and quality of essential oils from rhizomes of Cyperus Rotundus

    No full text
    Medicinal plants play an important role as useful resources in producing new and safer drugs for the treatment of various diseases. The objective of this study was to compare the yield, chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils (EOs) obtained by two different techniques from rhizomes of genius Cyperus of which C. rotundus (Family: Cyperaceae) belongs to. The EOs was obtained by Steam Distillation (SD) and Hydrodistillation (HD). The chemical compositions were analyzed by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy (GC-MS). The antimicrobial activity was tested by disc diffusion method against four microbes namely; Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans. The oil content was 0.18% and 0.27% (v/w) for HD and SD, respectively. The GC-MS analysis led to identification of 71 and 74 components, respectively. The dominant compounds for HD were: 3-Hydroxy-2-(2-methylcyclohex-1-enyl) propionaldehyde (11.20%); 2-cyclohexene-1-1one, 3-methyl-6(1-methyl-31) (8.23%) and 1,4-methanoazulene-9-methanol (5.43%). Whereas for SD were: 3-Hydroxy-2-(2-methylcyclohex-1enyl) propionaldehyde (12.94%), Tricyclo [6.3.0.0(2,4) undec-8ene,3,3,7,11-tetramethyl-(6,48%), 1-Oxaspiro[2.5]octane,5,5-dimethyl-4-(3-methyl-1,3-butan dienyl)- (5.66%) and 4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol,1,5,9-diol,1,5,9-trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl) -(5.57%). The antimicrobial activities of the oils against tested microorganism were extremely broad, the inhibition zones ranged between 10 and 17 mm. For HD oil, the Candida was the most sensitive to the oil (16 mm) and S. aureus was the most resistant (10 mm). Whereas, for SD oil, the S. aureus was the most sensitive (17 mm) while K. pneumoniae and C. albicans were the most resistance (12 mm). In conclusion, the results obtained from this study proved that the extraction technique is one of the main factors that can affect in the EOs yield, constituents and biological activities. Moreover, the results suggest that the EOs of C. rotundus could be a potential source of antimicrobial ingredients for food and pharmaceutical industries. Therefore, a wide bioassay against more microbes, isolation and identification of bioactive compounds would be an interesting line of inquiry for the further studies

    Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Salvia Officinals Essential Oils

    Get PDF
    The microbes’ diseases are one of the health problems for many countries. The aim of this study was to investigate the chemical components, antimicrobial activity of essential oils from dry leaves of Salvia officinalis L. (sage). The oil was obtained by steam distillation and analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC–MS). The antimicrobial assay of the oils was evaluated against four microbes (three bacteria and one fungus) namely; Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans by disc diffusion method. The chemical composition analysis of the essential oils by GC–MS led to the identification of 48 components, and the dominant compounds were: Eucalyptol (30.56%), (+)-2-Bornanone (13.59%), (IR)-2,6,6-Trimethylbicyclo (3.1.1) hept-2-e (7.02%) and camphene (6.96%). In the antimicrobial activity test, the oil showed moderate to good activities against tested microorganisms. The antimicrobial activity of the oils against bacteria was far higher than against fungus. In conclusion the S. officinalis essential oil showed potential antimicrobial activity. The research may warrant further work to determine the bioactive compound(s)

    Importance of missingness in baseline variables: A case study of the All of Us Research Program.

    No full text
    ObjectiveThe All of Us Research Program collects data from multiple information sources, including health surveys, to build a national longitudinal research repository that researchers can use to advance precision medicine. Missing survey responses pose challenges to study conclusions. We describe missingness in All of Us baseline surveys.Study design and settingWe extracted survey responses between May 31, 2017, to September 30, 2020. Missing percentages for groups historically underrepresented in biomedical research were compared to represented groups. Associations of missing percentages with age, health literacy score, and survey completion date were evaluated. We used negative binomial regression to evaluate participant characteristics on the number of missed questions out of the total eligible questions for each participant.ResultsThe dataset analyzed contained data for 334,183 participants who submitted at least one baseline survey. Almost all (97.0%) of the participants completed all baseline surveys, and only 541 (0.2%) participants skipped all questions in at least one of the baseline surveys. The median skip rate was 5.0% of the questions, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 2.5% to 7.9%. Historically underrepresented groups were associated with higher missingness (incidence rate ratio (IRR) [95% CI]: 1.26 [1.25, 1.27] for Black/African American compared to White). Missing percentages were similar by survey completion date, participant age, and health literacy score. Skipping specific questions were associated with higher missingness (IRRs [95% CI]: 1.39 [1.38, 1.40] for skipping income, 1.92 [1.89, 1.95] for skipping education, 2.19 [2.09-2.30] for skipping sexual and gender questions).ConclusionSurveys in the All of Us Research Program will form an essential component of the data researchers can use to perform their analyses. Missingness was low in All of Us baseline surveys, but group differences exist. Additional statistical methods and careful analysis of surveys could help mitigate challenges to the validity of conclusions

    The All of Us Research Program: Data quality, utility, and diversity.

    Get PDF
    The All of Us Research Program seeks to engage at least one million diverse participants to advance precision medicine and improve human health. We describe here the cloud-based Researcher Workbench that uses a data passport model to democratize access to analytical tools and participant information including survey, physical measurement, and electronic health record (EHR) data. We also present validation study findings for several common complex diseases to demonstrate use of this novel platform in 315,000 participants, 78% of whom are from groups historically underrepresented in biomedical research, including 49% self-reporting non-White races. Replication findings include medication usage pattern differences by race in depression and type 2 diabetes, validation of known cancer associations with smoking, and calculation of cardiovascular risk scores by reported race effects. The cloud-based Researcher Workbench represents an important advance in enabling secure access for a broad range of researchers to this large resource and analytical tools
    corecore